# Planning the Project & Community track at IPFS Camp **URL:** \ **Category:** Working Groups & Communities\ **Tags:** ipfs-camp\ **Created:** [May 16, 2024, 4:29pm UTC](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/t/planning-the-project-community-track-at-ipfs-camp/17998 "2024-05-16T16:29:35Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![robin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ipfs.tech/robin/32/7938_2.png) [@robin](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/u/robin)\ **Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 4:29pm UTC](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/t/planning-the-project-community-track-at-ipfs-camp/17998/1 "2024-05-16T16:29:35Z")
We are planning the **Project & Community** track for the coming [IPFS Camp](https://2024.ipfs.camp/) and we want to hear from you what you think should be in it — even if you’re not attending. We’ve broken it down into three sections: ### IPFS: Invidious Presentations and Feuding Session The goal of this section is to stir things up: we want 3-5 thought-provoking presentations, ~10m each, followed by joint discussion/reflection. Note that when we say provoking, we mean it. Example talk ideas include: - We Need To Talk: Breaking Up IPFS - Is Iroh The New IPFS? - CIDv7 When? - [Does IPFS Need A Product?](https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3ks3j7yuje226) - Have You Talked To A User Lately? - Renaming everything - Decentralization Is Bad, Actually - Beyond Phishing and Hentai: What Are Gateways For? ### Governing the Commons - Public Utilities WG – adding community stakeholders, governance process to steward the Amino/mainnet public network - Which standards where? - How do we converge on a shared subset of IPFS that’s interoperable? ### Info Session - IPFS Implementations Fund retro - IPFS Core Fund update - Fundraising & business panel from companies - Fireside chat w/ Funding the Commons? Thoughts? Screams? Volunteering for a talk? Let us know what you want to see! ---
**Author:** ![mosh](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ipfs.tech/mosh/32/5637_2.png) [@mosh](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/u/mosh)\ **Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 7:47pm UTC](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/t/planning-the-project-community-track-at-ipfs-camp/17998/2 "2024-05-16T19:47:14Z")
In the “governing the commons” section, I think the public network and utilities is one of the best candidates to truly “exit to community”. As IPFS transitions out of Protocol Labs incubation, there’s a good opportunity to ensure users and community leaders — particularly ones using the public utilities to improve digital human rights and access to information — have seats at the table to set future goals for availability, privacy, and other aspects of the network. I love the salty presentations idea. There are lots of and I think some strong opinions, loosely held, can be a good way to open up some challenging conversations. I’m interested in preparing or contributing to the “We Need To Talk” topic. ---
**Author:** ![wheresaddie](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ipfs.tech/wheresaddie/32/8607_2.png) [@wheresaddie](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/u/wheresaddie)\ **Post date:** [May 28, 2024, 11:21am UTC](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/t/planning-the-project-community-track-at-ipfs-camp/17998/3 "2024-05-28T11:21:51Z")
could we consider some call to actions that have varying weights to them (from say I can do this right now in 2 mins to this might take 2 years) and see if we can get some community willing to be the change to whats not working for them… ---
**Author:** ![bumblefudge](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ipfs.tech/bumblefudge/32/7945_2.png) [@bumblefudge](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/u/bumblefudge)\ **Post date:** [July 4, 2024, 1:22pm UTC](https://discuss.ipfs.tech/t/planning-the-project-community-track-at-ipfs-camp/17998/4 "2024-07-04T13:22:13Z")
> [@mosh](#): > > I love the salty presentations idea. There are lots of and I think some strong opinions, loosely held, can be a good way to open up some challenging conversations Someone ordered a salt delivery? I have been spelunking around in old threads here and on github thinking about interop and decoupling. If there is appetite, I have been thinking about “internal specs” and “internal interop”, which could from one angle be seen as a productization discussion or from another just a backlog generation/ordering exercise. I wrote up (excessively detailed) notes for anyone curious: > **[Of Grammatology: IPFS as Language Family](https://learningproof.xyz/of-grammatology-ipfs-as-language-family/)** > > Are we still referring to IPFS as one system?