From @shalnoff on Fri Dec 25 2015 09:13:36 GMT+0000 (UTC)
Is it possible to identify the file that chunk is owned (and vice versa)?
Copied from original issue: File-chunk identification possibility · Issue #85 · ipfs-inactive/faq · GitHub
From @RichardLitt on Thu Mar 10 2016 19:02:19 GMT+0000 (UTC)
I’m not sure. @diasdavid @whyrusleeping what do you think?
From @whyrusleeping on Mon May 02 2016 19:37:32 GMT+0000 (UTC)
@shalnoff could you clarify what you mean?
From @diasdavid on Tue May 03 2016 18:28:18 GMT+0000 (UTC)
@shalnoff if your question is ‘given a chunk, can I identify the file it belongs to, without any other information at all’, the answer is no, you can’t, that would violate the principle of a DAG.
From @mcast on Tue Sep 13 2016 20:38:27 GMT+0000 (UTC)
> @shalnoff if your question is ‘given a chunk, can I identify the file it belongs to, without any other information at all’, the answer is no, you can’t, that would violate the principle of a DAG.
I would only add, “…unless you have some extra information”. Would these methods work?
- fetching the chunk’s data, recognising some distinctive feature of its encoding. e.g. it’s plain text, or gzipped text with a convenient block start; take five words and put them into a search engine to get the original.
- enumerate (#155) a large enough swathe to discover (some of) the chunk’s parents.
- be in possession of some kind of reverse-lookup index, constructed from such enumeration
In a different chunking system, which could ride ipfs it is by design impossible to identify chunks.
From @shalnoff on Wed Sep 28 2016 21:35:28 GMT+0000 (UTC)
Clear, that’s what I’d like to clarify. Thank you (sorry for late reply)