Is converting a hash to a buffer more efficent than a public gateway?

Two part question:

let’s say i’ve added a file with a hash QmPChd2hVbrJ6bfo3WBcTW4iZnpHm8TEzWkLHmLpXhF68A

is it more reliable to display the file in a browser by converting the hash back into a buffer like this?

const fileBuffer = await‘QmPChd2hVbrJ6bfo3WBcTW4iZnpHm8TEzWkLHmLpXhF68A’)

console.log(‘Added file contents:’, fileBuffer.toString())
//do something to display this data in web page

Or is embedding a public gateway in a web page like this reliable:

my concern is for a larger file or one that isn’t pinned - the public gateway will not be reliable and it is “safer” to convert the hash back to buffer and handle displaying it in a web page with the buffer data.

Second question:
when I use the cat method on a hash it returns [object object] but I am expecting a string. Is there a more up to date example of using cat method with js-ipfs?

1 Like

Interested in this question as well.

I was able to convert file back to data this this

for await (const fileBuffer of await{
console.log(‘Added---->:’, fileBuffer)

this is using the js-ipfs library, by the way