There is a kind of reciprocal relationship between profiles and “lean” or “subset” implementations of IPFS-- if you only need support for one profile, you might not need all of kubo or helia, which could make all the difference in the implementability of IPFS in your use case!
@Mosh recommended breaking out this thread inside another one and I think it’s a worthwhile mini-research project to do an inventory of lean-client prior art.
- The most recent commit to the Debian package seems to not build as configured and thus fail CI – but that could be for a lot of reasons, and the last commit is over a year old.
- One of the underlying rust crates built into this^ package is ipfs-cid, which hit v2.0.0 6 months ago, and is maintained by an unfamiliar face. This crate seems worth tracking independently from the debian package, IMHO, since many architectures require a CID-only library to run in resource-constrained corners just as a checksum/security check for CIDs and referents they get from other services.
- MarshalX/python-libipld (features list from readme) - seems load-bearing for all of AT Proto
- David Buchanon’s CBRR library might also qualify